|
Part
I - Full-time learning vs. combining learning with a profession
Rabbi Yitzchak Breitowitz
July 19, 1999
General
introduction
We will attempt here to explore a diversity of views on the
subject of Torah and professionalism. When Rav Yaakov Kaminetsky
zt”l discussed this issue he emphasized that it is not an area subject
to clear cut halakhic analysis or precise quantification. There
are so many personal subjective factors involved – different people
have different talents, strengths, weaknesses. Certainly it is illegitimate
to say that everyone must go to college or pursue a professional
career, but it also cannot be responsibly said that no one can.
Which direction one takes is an individual decision that demands
serious thought and guidance, both from people and from Jewish sources.
In my own
life I have experienced both the positive and negative aspects of
the professional world. There are a number of strong and compelling
reasons not to enter college and the professions, but there are
also a number of positive reasons to get involved in the world outside
yeshiva. No position can in any way detract from the value of Torah
study. Whatever path we take we must pray for much Divine assistance
and guidance.
The Brisker
Rov: Full time Torah study vs. learning a trade
There is a seeming contradiction in the gemara at the end of
Kiddushin in the context of a discussion of parents’ obligations
towards their children.
Rabbi
Meir says, “A person should always make sure to teach his son
a ‘clean and easy’ occupation.” Rabbi Nehorai says, “I put aside
all the occupations in the world and I only teach my son Torah.”
This would
simply be a standard presentation of a talmudic dispute if not for
the statement of the gemara in Eiruvin 13 saying that Rabbi Meir
and Rabbi Nehorai are the same person!
The Brisker
Rov’s analysis: The gemara in Berakhot 35b quotes the dispute between
Rabbi Yishmael and Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai surrounding the verse
(in Keriat Shema), “You will gather your grain, wine and oil.” Rabbi
Yishmael sees this as a source for combining Torah study with derech
eretz (literally, the way of the world; here, a worldly occupation).
Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai counters: Is it possible that a person will
plow in the plowing season, sow in the sowing season, reap in the
harvest season, thresh in the threshing season, and winnow in the
winnowing season [and still learn Torah seriously]? What will become
of the Torah? Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai is forced to limit the verse
to when the Jews are not serving G-d properly and must fend for
themselves agriculturally.
Abbayei
concludes the passage with the observation: “Many followed Rabbi
Yishmael’s approach and it worked for them; . . . Rabbi Shimon bar
Yochai’s and it did not work for them.” The Gra points out that
even though the appropriate approach for the “many” is that
of Rabbi Yishmael, there are a number of “yechidei segula”, unique
special people in each generation, for whom the Rabbi Shimon bar
Yochai approach can work.
The Brisker
Rov thereby answers the contradiction between Rabbi Meir = Rabbi
Nehorai’s two statements. When giving general direction, “A person
should always,” Rabbi Meir takes the Torah and derech eretz approach,
learning Torah accompanied with a profession. When speaking of his
personal approach, he says, “I put aside all occupations in the
world and I only teach my son Torah.” This is in line with the Rambam’s
statement at the end of the laws of Shemitta and Yovel that speak
about the legitimacy of individuals acting like the tribe of Levi
and dedicating themselves to Torah while being supported by Klal
Yisrael.
Why are
there so many people learning in Kollel today?
Contrary to some popular myths, in pre-war Europe most Jews
were either working (often starting at age fourteen) or trying to.
The yeshivot of eastern Europe were, for the most part, elitist.
It follows that many of those who learned in kollel became gedolei
Torah. But the overwhelming majority of Jews were involved in earning
a living.
Why has
this changed in the post-war Orthodox world? This is an atypical
period in Jewish history. Why, in many Orthodox circles, has full-time
kollel learning become such an accepted norm? Two reasons are often
given for this:
- Full-time learning
is seen by some as a necessary strategy for keeping one’s head
religiously above water in a predominantly non-religious environment.
Even though the common Eastern-European Orthodox Jew was not studying
in kollel, he was surrounded with religious life. He would pray
three times a day and often say Tehillim or attend an Ein Yaakov
or Chayei Adam shiur. Home life followed tradition, Torah and
mitzvot. There was a not uncommon custom for a baalabus who worked
all week to stay awake all Shabbat night and learn. There were
cobblers who knew Shas. The modern Jewish environment is so much
more secular. Many basic Jewish values and mores are just ignored
by many. Kollel might be a necessity even for many Jews, even
if they are not necessarily the most gifted in order to retain
a strong religious life.
- The post-Holocaust
era is a Jewish state of emergency. Many of the gedolim of Europe
were killed in the Holocaust and there is a need for an emergency
revival of Torah.
Even when
one adds up all the people learning in yeshivot in Israel and the
diaspora, one still only arrives at a small fraction of the Jewish
people as a whole. The tribe of Levi was originally intended to
be supported by the whole people to be able to devote themselves
to Torah and service of Hashem on behalf of the whole people. The
population of the yeshiva world roughly parallels that of the tribe
of Levi and can build on the biblical model.
A word
of caution
Even if the Orthodox community (or parts of it) is able to justify
such a change from the norm (the Rabbi Yishmael approach of combining
Torah with work), we must beware of possible negative side effects.
One example: the difficulty a working person might find in finding
shidduchim or a school for his children in a community where kollel
is the norm. Choosing a mate should emphasize character and fear
of Hashem, not only whether someone or his parents are involved
in full time learning. Those men and women that find that the kollel
lifestyle does not fit them should not feel disparaged and their
children should not feel embarrassed.
Next part,
G-d willing: Negative and Positive
aspects of involvement in college and the professional world.
Adaptation
prepared by Eliezer Kwass
On
Rabbi Yitzchok Breitowitz
Rabbi Breitowitz is Associate Professor of Law at the University
of Maryland and the Rabbi of the Woodside Synagogue in Silver Spring,
Maryland. He received Rabbinical Ordination from the Ner Israel
Rabbinical College in 1976; B.S. with honors from Johns Hopkins
University; J.D (magna cum laude) from Harvard Law School in 1979;
and a Doctorate in Talmudic Law from Ner Israel in 1992. He has
lectured extensively throughout the US and Israel on medical, business
and family ethics. He has published numerous articles on bankruptcy,
commercial law, medical ethics, family law, and halakha.
|